Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Substantive Disagreement in the Le Monde Debate and Beyond: Replies to Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt.Scott Hill - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11):18-25.
    I reply to criticisms from Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt. I argue that the central disputes on this topic concern how ordinary people understand conspiracy theories and how to evaluate concrete conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Dominant Ordinary Use of ‘Conspiracy Theory‘ is Narrow: A Reply to Censon.Scott Hill - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4):38-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • An Interdisciplinary Drama: Conspiracist Philosophers versus Conspiring Social Scientists?Francesco Censon - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4):12-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
    Home | Bibliographies | About PhilArchive | Contact us | Code of conduct

    CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
    PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
    This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

    Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo