Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Russell on Naturalism and Practical Reason. [REVIEW]Christopher Bennett - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):347-356.
    This response to Paul Russell looks at how we should understand the moral sentiments and their role in action. I think that there is an important tension in Russell’s interpretation of this role. On the one hand, aspects of Russell’s position commit him to some kind of rationalism about the emotions: for instance, he has argued that P. F. Strawson’s account of the reactive is crudely naturalistic; and he has claimed that emotions are constitutive of our sensitivity to moral reasons. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Tension in Critical Compatibilism.Robert H. Wallace - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (1):321-332.
    (Part of a symposium on an OUP collection of Paul Russell's papers on free will and moral responsibility). Paul Russell’s The Limits of Free Will is more than the sum of its parts. Among other things, Limits offers readers a comprehensive look at Russell’s attack on the problematically idealized assumptions of the contemporary free will debate. This idealization, he argues, distorts the reality of our human predicament. Herein I pose a dilemma for Russell’s position, critical compatibilism. The dilemma illuminates the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Limits of Responsibility? [REVIEW]Ezio Di Nucci - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1):317-319.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark