On the Best Accuracy Arguments for Probabilism

Philosophy of Science 89 (3):621-630 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Pettigrew reports a generalization of the celebrated accuracy-dominance theorem due to Predd et al., but Pettigrew’s proof is incorrect. I will explain the mistakes and provide a correct proof.

Author's Profile

Michael Nielsen
University of Sydney

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-12

Downloads
435 (#40,184)

6 months
121 (#33,400)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?