Quine on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction

Russell Gillian

In Ernie Lepore & Gilbert Harman (eds.), A Companion to W. V. O. Quine. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 181-202 (2013) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

A critical survey of Quine's arguments against the analytic/synthetic distinction.

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

View on PhilPapers

Author's Profile

Gillian Russell

Australian Catholic University

Archival history

Archival date: 2017-04-18
View all versions

Categories

Analyticity and A Priority in Philosophy of Language

Analyticity, Misc in Philosophy of Language

Empiricism, Misc in Metaphilosophy

The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction in Philosophy of Language

W. V. O. Quine in 20th Century Philosophy

Keywords

Quine analytic analytic/synthetic Two Dogmas truth by convention confirmation holism radical empiricism epistemology epistemology of logic definition

Reprint years

2014

ISBN(s)

9781118607992 9780470672105

DOI

10.1002/9781118607992.ch9

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-18

Downloads
1,782 (#5,373)

6 months
242 (#10,112)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.

How can I increase my downloads?