Conjunctive forks and temporally asymmetric inference

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):1 – 23 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue against some of Reichenbach's claims about causal forks are incorrect. We do not see why the Second Law of Thermodynamics rules out the existence of conjunctive forks open to the past. In addition, we argue that a common effect rarely forms a conjunctive fork with its joint causes, but it sometimes does. Nevertheless, we think there is something to be said for Reichenbach's idea that forks of various kinds are relevant to explaining why we know more about the past than about the future. And entropy turns out to play a role in the explanation, though not the determining role that Reichenbach envisions.

Author's Profile

Elliott Sober
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
243 (#65,385)

6 months
91 (#51,272)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?