A Miserable Argument

In Marc Champagne (ed.), Sam Harris: Critical Responses. Carus Books. pp. 115-25 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his arguments that science itself can answer moral questions, Sam Harris often appeals to our intuitions about the badness of suffering. If we share these intuitions, Harris argues, we’ve taken a significant step in conceding to a basically utilitarian worldview. In this chapter, I critically assess Harris’ arguments and find them deeply wanting.

Author's Profile

Mark Warren
University of New South Wales

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-20

Downloads
556 (#30,491)

6 months
372 (#5,104)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?